Simple Additive Weighting Method Equipped with Fuzzy Ranking of Evaluated Alternatives

Krzysztof Piasecki , Ewa Roszkowska , Anna Łyczkowska-Hanćkowiak

Abstract

From the perspective of each evaluation criterion, any decision alternative is evaluated by means of trapezoidal ordered fuzzy numbers (TrOFN). This approach is justified in the way that some criteria are linguistically evaluated. In this paper, decision alternatives are evaluated using oriented fuzzy Simple Additive Weighting (OF-SAW) scoring function. The ranking of alternatives may be defined by means of a nonincreasing sequence of defuzzified values of a scoring function. Any defuzzification procedure distorts ordered fuzzy numbers in a way that information on imprecision and orientation is lost. This undermines the credibility of the determined alternatives’ ranking. The main purpose of this paper is to avoid the defuzzification stage in the OF-SAW method. Thus, the OF-SAW method is equipped with fuzzy scoring order. This OF-SAW method is described as a negotiation scoring system. We study an empirical example of the OF-SAW application and rank some negotiation offers. Here, we focus on the effects of replacing the defuzzified scoring function by a fuzzy one. The obtained conclusions are generalized for the case of any decision alternatives.
Author Krzysztof Piasecki (WZ / KIiN)
Krzysztof Piasecki,,
- Department of Investment and Real Estate
, Ewa Roszkowska - Uniwersytet w Białymstoku, MNiSW [80]
Ewa Roszkowska,,
-
, Anna Łyczkowska-Hanćkowiak - Wyższa Szkoła Bankowa w Poznaniu
Anna Łyczkowska-Hanćkowiak,,
-
Journal seriesSymmetry-Basel, [Symmetry], ISSN 2073-8994, (N/A 70 pkt)
Issue year2019
Vol11
No4
Pages1-18
Publication size in sheets0.85
Article number482
Keywords in Polishskierowana liczba rozmyta, lingwistyczna skala porządkowa, metoda SAW, defuzzyfikacja, rozmyty ranking, alternatywa decyzyjna, problem negocjacyjny
Keywords in English ordered fuzzy number; linguistic order scale; Simple Additive Weighting method; defuzzification; fuzzy ranking; decision alternative; negotiation problem
ASJC Classification1601 Chemistry (miscellaneous); 1701 Computer Science (miscellaneous); 2600 General Mathematics; 3101 Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
DOIDOI:10.3390/sym11040482
URL https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/11/4/482
Languageen angielski
Score (nominal)70
Score sourcejournalList
ScoreMinisterial score = 70.0, 16-06-2020, ArticleFromJournal
Publication indicators WoS Citations = 0; Scopus SNIP (Source Normalised Impact per Paper): 2016 = 0.64; WoS Impact Factor: 2018 = 2.143 (2) - 2018=2.041 (5)
Citation count*6 (2020-07-05)
Cite
Share Share

Get link to the record


* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Back
Confirmation
Are you sure?